You keep ownership of the work, the priorities and the delivery process. We supply capability that is hard to hire quickly — screened, contracted, compliant and accountable to measures agreed before anyone starts.
The commercial and governance structure changes with the model. We will recommend one based on your scope rather than defaulting to the largest.
| Model | You own | We own | Best when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staff augmentation | Priorities, task assignment, delivery process, code and output review | Sourcing, screening, contracting, compliance, replacement cover | You have capacity gaps in a team that already works well |
| Dedicated team | Backlog, acceptance criteria, release decisions | Team composition, day-to-day management, throughput against the backlog | You need a whole workstream run without expanding your own management layer |
| Managed capacity | Definition of the work and acceptance of the output | Staffing, process, service-level attainment and reporting | The work is repeatable and can be measured by volume and quality |
| Build-operate-transfer | The end-state design and the transfer decision | Standing the function up, running it, documenting it, handing it over | You want your own capability eventually but need it running now |
If a requirement sits outside these areas we will say so rather than putting forward a stretch profile.
Every profile you see has been through the same sequence. You interview and select — we never assign someone you have not approved.
We write down the role, the must-have skills, the seniority and the working pattern, and confirm it with you.
Technical screening against the agreed criteria, plus verification of identity and right to work for the location.
You interview the shortlist directly. Feedback goes back into the criteria if the shortlist is not right.
Contracting, security checks, system access and induction — run in parallel so the start date holds.
A named account contact, agreed reporting, and defined replacement cover if a placement is not working.
When the work is repeatable and better measured by volume and quality than by headcount, managed process delivery is usually the better structure.
When the requirement needs a design decision before it needs delivery capacity.
Including an honest view of the market rate and the realistic lead time.
